Yashoda Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49281 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -369 Year- 2016 Thana -MOTIHARI MUFASIL DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Yashoda Devi, W/o Bhola Mahto, R/o Rupadih P.S.- Motihari Muffasil Dist.-East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhannjay Kumar No 2, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 4/ 20-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner apprehends her arrest in Motihari Muffasil P.S. Case No.369 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 304-B, 201, 120-B Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is mother-in-law of the deceased.

In the written report, there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Motihari Muffasil P.S. Case No.369 of 2016,she shall be released on anticipatory bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49281 of 2017 (4) dt.20-02-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T