Dinesh Thakur And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4277 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -546 Year- 2017 Thana -JAHANABAD District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Dinesh Thakur, S/o Sri Yadu Nandan Sharma @ Yadu Nandan Thakur,

2. Sunaina Devi, W/o Dinesh Thakur, Both are resident of Dev Banshi Khanda, P.S.- Jahanabad, O.P. Kalpa, DistJahanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tilak Sao, Advocate. For the informant : Mr. Paras Nath, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Abhay Kumar - 1, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 19-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 546 of 2017, instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are parents-in-law of the deceased. The husband is already in custody.

From the written report it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. Learned counsel for the informant has appeared and opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4277 of 2018 (3) dt.19-02-2018 2/2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 546 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Judge-I-cum-A.C.J.M., Jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and their absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel their bail bond and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T