Ramesh Kumar Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48522 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -113 Year- 2017 Thana -KUNDWACHAINPUR DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Ramesh Kumar Das, Son of Rambabu Das, Resident of VillageMushahariya, P.S.- Kundwa Chainpur, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Kumar Virendra Narayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-10-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Chainpur P.S.Case No.113 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 172 and 173 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation against the petitioner is about recovery of 45.3 ltrs. of nepali liquor from a motorcycle and the petitioner is named in the FIR .

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and nothing has been recovered from his possession. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he has remained in custody for about 1 1⁄2 months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-VII-cumSpecial Judge, Excise, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Kundwa Chainpur P.S.Case No.113 of 2017. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled.

(iv) If his active participation is found in such type of cases in future, his bail bond shall be cancelled. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T