Pinku Kumar @ Pinku Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69616 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2024 Thana- KHAGAUL District- Patna ====================================================== Pinku Kumar @ Pinku Paswan Son of Ramchandar Paswan Resident of village - Nayan Chak, P.S.- Khagaul, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 07-10-2025 Heard Mr. Arvind Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Khagaul P.S. Case No. 33 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the petitioner along with other 15 persons killed the brother of the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that from perusal of the FIR, it is clear that no one is eye-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69616 of 2025(2) dt.07-10-2025 2/2 witness of the alleged occurrence and the nature of allegation is general and omnibus. It has also been submitted that similarly situated other co-accused person has been granted anticipatory bail by learned co-ordinate bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 83665 of 2024. The case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is languishing in judicial custody since 30.07.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.- III, Danapur in connection with Khagaul P.S. Case No. 33 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T