← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4983/2018rejected

Raghu Vansh Mani Singh @ Raghu Vansh Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2018-02-02Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4983 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -154 Year- 2015 Thana -MOKAMA District- PATNA ======================================================

1. RAGHU VANSH MANI SINGH @ RAGHU VANSH SINGH, aged about 63 Years,

2. Nand Kishor Singh, Aged about 60 Years,

3. Dinanath Singh, aged about 58 Years, All Sons of Late Ramchandra Singh,

4. Rajiv Ranjan @ Rajiv Ranjan Singh, Aged about 40 Years S/o Shri Raghu Vansh Mani Singh,

5. Sutikshan Kumar, aged about 30 Years, S/o Shri Dina Nath Singh, All, R/o Village- Barahpur, P.S.- Mokama, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Nath Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jai Narayan Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 02-02-2018 Heard both sides.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Mokama P.S. case No. 154 of 2015 under Section 307 and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of the Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that initially the case was registered under Section 307 and other Sections of IPC and under Section 27 of the Arms Act but police after investigation submitted charge sheet under bailable sections of the IPC even thereafter the learned Magistrate took cognizance under Section 307 of the IPC and under Section 27 of the Arms

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4983 of 2018 (2) dt.02-02-2018 2/2 Act. It is submitted that the case has been compromised but from perusal of paragraph 3 of the petition it appears that petitioners have got criminal antecedent.

Considering the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

If the petitioners surrender in the court below, the learned court below shall consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners taking into consideration all these facts and pass order on the bail petition, preferably, on the same day. (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) BKS/- U T