← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/2992/2017allowed

Bachandeo Sharma And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2018-01-04Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.2992 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -53 Year- 2017 Thana -SALAIYA District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Bachandeo Sharma son of Late Suryadev Sharma

2. Ravindra Sharma son of Bachandeo Sharma

3. Harendra Sharma @ Harendra Sharm son of Bachandeo Sharma All are resident of Village- Pir Bigha, P.O.- Shimla, P.S. Salaiya, DistrictAurangabad. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan, SPP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Aurangabad, in connection with Saliya Police Station Case No.53 of 2017 registered under Sections 147/149/341/323/325/504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The occurrence of assault allegedly took place for trivial dispute. Hence, let the appellants, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2992 of 2017 (5) dt.04-01-2018 P2/ Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with condition that the appellants shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellants.

Accordingly, the appeal stands allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T