Patna High CourtL.P.A/1335/2017dismissed

Halo Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-05-03Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1335 of 2017 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17913 of 2008 =========================================================== Halo Devi, wife of Late Wazir Yadav, resident of Village- Bihta, Police StationSheikhpura, District- Sheikhpura. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Vishweswaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

2. The Deputy Secretary, Road Construction Department, Vishweswaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

3. The Deputy Secretary-cum- Chief Vigilence Officer, Road Construction Department, Vishweswaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

4. The Engineer-in- Chief, Road Construction Department, Vishweswaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

5. The Finance Commissioner, Finance Department, Old Secretariat, Police Station- Sachivalaya, District- Patna.

6. The Secretary, Technical Examination Cell, Cabinet Vigilance Department, Patna.

7. The Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Division, Bihar Sharif, Nalanda.

8. The Assistant Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Division, Bihar Sharif, Nalanda. null null

9. The Accountant General (A & E), Bihar, Virchand Patel Path, Patna.

10. The Treasury Officer, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. RAJ BALLABH PD.SINGH -AAG11 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 03-05-2018

Patna High Court LPA No.1335 of 2017 dt.03-05-2018 2/2 The Court has perused the pleadings in C.W.J.C. No. 17913 of 2008 and the prayer made therein.

Looking at the prayer made in paragraphs-1 and 2, learned Single Judge has rightly taken a view that withdrawal of the earlier writ application will come in the way of the appellant pursuing the issue second time.

No interference is warranted with the order under challenge. Appeal is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) Devendra/Arjun AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 05.05.2018 Transmission Date