Ranjan Singh @ Suryalal Singh @ Suryapal Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.9875 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2014 Thana- WARSALIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== Ranjan Singh @ Suryalal Singh @ Suryapal Singh S/o Late Udai Narayan Singh, R/o Village- Parbati, P.S.- Sahpur, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Devendra Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 19-02-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 184 of 2014 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 472 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.
The case of the prosecution is that the police received secret information that a boy was standing near the A.T.M. to withdraw money after cheating in the name of Chehra Pahchano Inam Paao and when the police reached there and arrested the said boy, he disclosed his name as Chandan Kumar and upon search, two A.T.M. cards and a sum of Rs. 24,000/- were recovered. Thereafter, the investigating officer of the present case filed an application in the other case in which the petitioner
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9875 of 2018(2) dt.19-02-2018 2/3 is an accused for getting the petitioner remanded in the present matter and that is how, the name of the petitioner has transpired in the present case.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused person, who was apprehended from the spot, has neither named the petitioner nor the petitioner is an F.I.R. named accused person. It is further submitted that barring one case in which the petitioner is on bail, there is no criminal antecedent of the petitioner herein. It is further submitted that the petitioner is ready to join investigation and is ready to be put to such terms as may be directed by this Court.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it fit and proper to enlarge the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 184 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It is directed that the petitioner shall join investigation and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9875 of 2018(2) dt.19-02-2018 3/3 he should be present at the place where he is directed to appear by the investigating agency and in case, he does not cooperate with the investigation, the prosecution would be free to approach this Court for cancellation of bail. It is further directed that the petitioner would mark his attendance before the Officer-in-Charge of the concerned police station at 10:00 am. on each Monday of the week and in the event of two consecutive defaults, the present privilege of the anticipatory bail shall stand cancelled automatically. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) ajay gupta/- U T