Banarasi Bhagat @ Banarasi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.9879 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2016 Thana- KATEYA District- Gopalganj ======================================================
1. Banarasi Bhagat @ Banarasi, S/o Faujdari Bhagat
2. Gyanti Devi, W/o Banarsi Bhagat
3. Pushpa Devi, W/o Raj Kumar@ Raj Kumar Bhagat, All R/o VillageBelahi, P.S.- Kateya, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Harendra Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Smt. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 20-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
The petitioners apprehend arrest in Kateya P.S. Case No. 121 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 304B/34 of the IPC.
It has been submitted that petitioners are father-inlaw, mother-in-law and sister-in-law of the deceased. It is further submitted that the husband of the deceased has faced trial in S.Tr. No. 877 of 2016, wherein, he has been acquitted. In the written report, there is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners.
In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners, named above, in
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9879 of 2018(2) dt.20-02-2018 2/2 the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 121 of 2016 to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj, subject to condition as laid down u/S 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C. with further conditions (bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every dated fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bonds of the petitioners and (3) if the petitioners tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) khushbu/- U T