Niraj Kumar @ Niraj Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73436 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-434 Year-2025 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Niraj Kumar @ Niraj Kumar Singh, son of Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh Resident of village- Bishunpur Taraura, P.S.- Mahua, District -Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Natraj Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 21-01-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Mahua P.S. Case no.434 of 2025, registered under section 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that having heard halla, he came out of his house. He saw the three named accused persons including the petitioner herein who hurled bomb at the informant and escaped.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. There is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73436 of 2025(3) dt.21-01-2026 2/3 ongoing dispute between the parties with several cases pending between them as mentioned in the order of the learned Court below as also CWJC no.14475 of 2007 and LPA no.2117 of 2015. No injury has been caused to the informant. The petitioner is in custody since 17.7.2025 and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State who submits that not only the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. but there is direct allegation against him of having hurled bomb along with two others on the informant. However, it is not disputed by learned A.P.P. that there is no injury report of the informant on record.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner in the F.I.R., pending dispute between the parties as mentioned in the order of the learned trial Court, no injury report of the informant being available on record, the petitioner being in custody for 6 months since 17.7.2025 and charge-sheet having been submitted in the case, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Mahua P.S. Case no.434 of 2025, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73436 of 2025(3) dt.21-01-2026 3/3 satisfaction of the learned Sub Judge-V -cum- Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Vaishali, Hajipur.
(Partha Sarthy, J) avinash/- U T