Rampravesh Mehta @ Rampravesh Mahto @ Pravesh Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76505 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2024 Thana- SIMRA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

Rampravesh Mehta @ Rampravesh Mahto @ Pravesh Mahto S/o Late Mahipat Mehta Resident of village-Chilihiyawan, P.S.-Simra, DistrictAurangabad 2.

Lalinder Mehta @ Lalindra Mehta @ Lalindra Kumar S/o Deonandan Mehta Resident of village-Chilihiyawan, P.S.-Simra, District- Aurangabad 3.

Jai Prakash Kumar S/o Harihar Prasad @ Harihar Mahto Resident of villageChilihiyawan, P.S.-Simra, District- Aurangabad 4.

Om Prakash Kumar S/o Harihar Mahto @ Harihar Prasad Resident of village-Chilihiyawan, P.S.-Simra, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioners.

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 19-11-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506, 325, 307 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The petitioners along with other co-accused is said to have assaulted the informant and his family members by various means.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76505 of 2024(2) dt.19-11-2024 2/2 been falsely implicated in this case due to land dispute. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is admitted land dispute between the parties. Both sides have filed cases against each other and both sides have sustained grievous injury. Petitioner nos.1 and 2 have no criminal antecedent, while petitioner nos.3 and 4 and one criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Simra P.S. Case No.26 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T