Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54757/2017bail granted

Saddam Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-17Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54757 of 2017 (2) dt.17-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54757 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -171 Year- 2017 Thana -DURGAWATI District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================

1. Saddam Hussain, son of Md. Naim Miyan, resident of Village- Sanjhauli, P.S.- Sanjhauli, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Kant Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Durgawatti P.S. Case No. 171 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(A)/38 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 10.4 litres of country made liquor.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that recovery has been made from a public bus and petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. Further he has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 26.08.2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54757 of 2017 (2) dt.17-11-2017 recovery and period of custody and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge cum learned Additional District Judge-IVth, Kaimur at Bhabhua, in connection with Durgawatti P.S. Case No. 171 of 2017, subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T