Ajit Kumar Azad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76406 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-80 Year-2024 Thana- JANDAHA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Ajit Kumar Azad S/O Basudeo Rai @ Vasudev Ray R/O Village- Mirapur, P.S- Sakra, Distt.- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Ankita Kumari W/O Ajit Kumar Azad, D/O Awdesh Prasad Singh R/O Village and P.O- Mahisaur, P.S- Jandaha (Mahisaur O.P.), Distt.- Vaishali. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Joy Prakash Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumar, Advocate Mr. Adarsh Ranjan, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2.

2. The petitioner, husband of opposite party no. 2, apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 498(A), 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute between the parties has been settled amicably through the process of mediation and both parties have agreed to live together, as husband and wife. Petitioner also undertakes to keep opposite party no. 2 with full respect and dignity.

4. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 does not dispute the aforesaid contention and confirms the fact regarding the settlement entered into between the parties.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76406 of 2024(3) dt.08-07-2025 2/2

5. Here, it is relevant to mention that earlier, with consent of the parties, the matter was referred to Mediation & Conciliation Centre of Patna High Court to explore the possibility of settlement between the parties, which has been resolved in terms of Memorandum of Agreement annexed with Mediator's report.

6. In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the petitioner, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Jandaha (Mahisaur O.P.) P.S. Case No. 80 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with condition that petitioner shall abide by all the terms & conditions, mentioned in Memorandum of Agreement, failing which, the learned Court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond of petitioner." (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Neha/- U T