Ram Lakhan Prasadsd @ Shri Ram Lakhan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64959 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2019 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== RAM LAKHAN PRASADSD @ SHRI RAM LAKHAN PRASAD Son of Kali Prasad Resident of Village - Karihara, P.S.- Tankupa, Distt - Gaya, the then Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Nepa, P.S.- Tekari (Panchanpur), Distt - Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manish Kumar No2 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-10-2019 Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 30 of 2019, registered for the offences punishable under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per general direction of the District Magistrate, in view of the order of this Court passed in writ petition, the petitioner and other Panchyat Sewak were asked depositing folder relating to the appointment of the Panchayat teacher. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he was posted at Nepa Gram Panchyat between 2011 to 2016 and later on he was transferred on some other place, during that period no appointment has been made and petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64959 of 2019(2) dt.18-10-2019 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the above submission, this application allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Gaya, in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No.-30 of 2019, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further condition is that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned and further condition that he will approach the authority concerned as well as I.O. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) T.Kr./- U T