Sonu Nigam @ Deepak Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70575 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-228 Year-2022 Thana- BATHNAHA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

Sonu Nigam @ Deepak Kumar Son Of Lalbabu Yadav R/V- Jonka, P.SBathnaha, Dist- Sitamarhi 2.

Rahul Kumar Son Of Lalbabu Yadav R/V- Jonka, P.S- Bathnaha, DistSitamarhi 3.

Lalbabu Yadav Son Of Late Kishori Ray R/V- Jonka, P.S- Bathnaha, DistSitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ritesh Kumar Narain Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 01-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 324, 307, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, upon instigation of petitioner no. 3, petitioners no.1 and 2 inflicted knife blow upon the informant with intention to kill him causing injury upon his chest and left waist.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70575 of 2022(2) dt.01-05-2023 2/2 against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that there is land dispute between the parties. He further submits that the injury sustained by the informant was found simple in nature, this fact is also not denied by the learned counsel for the informant. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant oppose prayer for anticipatory bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of injury, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Bathnaha P.S. Case No.228 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T