Sriram Bind @ Siyaram Bind @ Ramchandra Bind @ Choli Bind @ Choli v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77545 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2024 Thana- BARHARA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Sriram Bind @ Siyaram Bind @ Ramchandra Bind @ Choli Bind @ Choli, Son of Sri Kashi Nath Bind @ Kashi Nath Mahto, Resident of Village- Chatar P.S.- Barhara, Dist.- Bhojpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ravindra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 27-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Barhara P.S. Case No.190 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.
3. The case of the prosecution is that from the possession of this petitioner, one loaded country made pistol and two live cartridges were recovered.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has no concern with alleged arms. There is no independent witness of the seizure list. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 28.06.2024.
5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77545 of 2024(3) dt.27-01-2025 2/2 prayer of regular bail and submitted that from perusal of the bail petition of this petitioner, it transpires that he has criminal antecedent of 18 cases and out of these cases, most of the cases are of similar nature.
6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of allegation, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.
7. Petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after six months, if so advised.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T