← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69893/2025allowed

Rohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-10-08Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69893 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-553 Year-2024 Thana- PATLIPUTRA District- Patna ====================================================== Rohit Kumar, S/o Mukesh Das, R/o Village- Lala Toli (Hansraj Ki Dehri) Noon Ka Chauraha, P.S.- Khajekala, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raju Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-10-2025 Heard Mr. Raju Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Patliputra P.S. Case No. 553 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the informant has gone in wedding ceremony at Madhubani. When he returned, he came to know that in his apartment theft of valuables worth Rs. 10-12 Lakh has been committed.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that petitioner was first of all

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69893 of 2025(2) dt.08-10-2025 2/2 remanded in Patliputra P.S. Case No. 591 of 2024 and after that he has been remanded in this case. It has also been submitted that the police has also recorded his confessional statement. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. His name has been framed in this case due to his criminal antecedent. He is languishing in judicial custody since 14.01.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-X, Patna in connection with Patliputra P.S. Case No. 553 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T