Laddu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53123 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -139 Year- 2017 Thana -KASIMBAZAR District- MUNGER ======================================================

1. Laddu Yadav, Son of Balmiki Yadav, resident of Sandalpur, Police Station- Kasim Bazar, District- Munger.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Aditya Narayan Singh 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-11-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kasim Bazar P.S.Cae No.139 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 307, 160 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is as per FIR is that the police received information about firing and the petitioner was arrested.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that nobody has received injury in this case and the petitioner is in custody since 18.8.2017. The other co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by the learned lower court itself. It has also been submitted that though he is accused in one more case but

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53123 of 2017 (2) dt.15-11-2017 2/2 he is on bail in that case.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Munger in connection with Kasim Bazar P.S.Case No.139 of 2017.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U