Deepak @ Chandan @ Raunak Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76923 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-456 Year-2019 Thana- LAHERIYASARAI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Deepak @ Chandan @ Raunak Singh Son of Shri Pramod Singh Resident of Ward no. 13, Gorhiari, P.S.- Bishanpur, Dist.- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Laheriasarai P.S. Case No. 456 of 2019 instituted for the offence under Sections 307, 302 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Earlier vide order dated 03-01-2022, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 14549 of 2021 anticipatory bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court. 3.

As per accusation against the petitioner, he allegedly fired and caused fire arm injury on the chest of brother of the informant.

4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 18-10-2024. Petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76923 of 2024(3) dt.08-08-2025 2/2 bears ten (10) criminal antecedents, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not apprehended from the place of occurrence. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. 6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. There is direct allegation of firing against the petitioner upon the brother of the informant, hence, he does not deserve the privilege of regular bail.

7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, there being direct allegation of firing against the petitioner upon the brother of the informant, hence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Prayer for grant of bail is rejected.

8.

The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial as expeditiously as possible without any undue delay and unnecessary adjournments.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T