Raju Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55780 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -191 Year- 2017 Thana -PARSABAZAR District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Raju Kumar, son of Binod Prasad, Resident of Village-Dariyapur, P.S.- Parsa Bazar, District-Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Priyank Deepak, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 3/ 22-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Parza Bazar P.S. Case No.191 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 341, 323, 504, 354-b Indian Penal Code.

Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that informant is an elderly lady aged about 35 years and mother of three children and the petitioner is a young boy aged about 22 years.

In the written report, there is general and omnibus allegation that this petitioner pulled the Dupatta of the informant with intention to misbehave with her.

It is stated in para 3 of the bail petition that petitioner has clean antecedents.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55780 of 2017 (3) dt.22-12-2017 2/2 In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Parza Bazar P.S. Case No.191 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of `10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions:

(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T