Amarjeet Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54386 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -142 Year- 2017 Thana -BITHAN BAZAR District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================

1. Amarjeet Yadav, S/o Late Khakhar Yadav, R/o Village- Pusaho, P.S.- Bithan, District- Samastipur.

2. Ranjeet Paswan @ Ranjit Paswan, S/o Laddulal Paswan, R/o VillageManorba, P.S.- Bithan, Distt.- Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-11-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Bithan P.S.Case No.142 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a), 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.. Allegation against the petitioner is about manufacturing country-made liquor and some liquor as well as articles for preparation of the liquor has also been recovered. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that they have been falsely implicated in this case and they are in custody for about three months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54386 of 2017 (2) dt.16-11-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge 2nd, Samastipur in connection with Bithan P.S.Case No.142 of 2017. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T