← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./71704/2022allowed

Ibrana Khatoon @ Ibrana Khatun @ Rabina Khatoon @ Raveena Khatun v. The State Of Bihar

2023-04-07Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71704 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-118 Year-2022 Thana- GHOGHARDIHA District- Madhubani ====================================================== IBRANA KHATOON @ IBRANA KHATUN @ RABINA KHATOON @ RAVEENA KHATUN W/o Sikandar R/v- Ghoghardiha Tola - Usmanganj, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ratanakar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bharat Bhushan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 07-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of killing the Grand-daughter (Natni) of the informant due to non-fulfillment of dowry demand.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. She has committed no offence. He submitted that petitioner is the sisterin-law (Nanad) of the deceased and has no concerned with the deceased as well as her husband (co-accused). He further

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71704 of 2022(3) dt.07-04-2023 2/2 submitted that petitioner lives separately from the deceased. The sole responsibility of taking care of wife is upon husband not against the petitioner as well as her other family members. She is languishing in judicial custody since 24.08.2022. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur (Madhubani) in connection with Ghorghardiha P.S. Case No. 118 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T