Shatrughan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72545 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-278 Year-2022 Thana- MADHEPURA COMPALINT CASE District- Madhepura ====================================================== SHATRUGHAN YADAV S/O LATE LALJEE YADAV R/O VILLAGEPOKHRAM, WARD NO. 03, P.S.- MURLIGANJ, DISTRICTMADHEPURA ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.
MINA DEVI W/O DILIP KUMAR, D/O LATE JANARDHAN YADAV R/O VILLAGE- POKHRAM, WARD NO. 03, P.S.- MURLIGANJ, DISTRICT- MADHEPURA, PRESENTLY RESIDENT OF MYKEKOLHAYAPATTI, P.S.- MURLIGANJ, DISTRICT- MADHEPURA ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy, A.P.P.
For the O.P. No. 2 :
Mr. Durgesh Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, complainant, and Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy, learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 323, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Allegation against the petitioner is of torturing and harassing the complainant due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.
4. Petitioner is father-in-law of the complainant.
5. It is submitted that there is general and omnibus
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72545 of 2023(3) dt.29-02-2024 2/2 allegation against the petitioner. Petitioner is separate in mess and property and he is not concerned with the family affairs of the complainant. Thrust of accusation is against husband of the complainant. Petitioner has got clean antecedent.
6. Learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposes the bail application.
7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Madhepura in connection with Complaint Case No. 278 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T