← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5061/2018bail granted

Bipin Kumar @ Bipin Bihari Sah v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-02-12Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5061 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1431 Year-2016 Thana- BHAGALPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Bipin Kumar @ Bipin Bihari Sah S/o Late Rajendra Prasad Sah, R/o VillageNarayan Das Lane, Marufchak, P.S.- Mojahidpur, Distt.- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Doli Kumari Bharti D/o Late Indra Kumar Saha, R/o Village- Aliganj, P.S.- Mojahidpur, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pravin Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. AJIT KUMAR ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A. 379, 497, 323, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, but cognizance has been taken under Sections 323, 498A of the I.P.C. and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5061 of 2018(3) dt.12-02-2018 2/2 petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Bhagalpur in connection with Complaint case No.1431 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U