Pramod Singh @ Pramod Kumar Singh And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.7051 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-82 Year-2016 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Jamui ======================================================
1. Pramod Singh @ Pramod Kumar Singh, S/o Late Gulab Singh,
2. Resma Devi @ Resam Devi, Wife of Pramod Singh @ Pramod Kumar Singh,
3. Manju Devi, Wife of Late Gulab Singh. All residents of VillageKarnauti, P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna.
4. Priyanka Kumari @ Priyanka Devi @ Priyanka Kumar, W/o Anup Kumar Singh, Resident of Village- Fatehpur Kerma, P.S. Navinagar, District- Aurangabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Kavita Kumari, W/o Santosh Singh, Resident of Village- Karnauti, P.S. Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna, Present Residing at D/o Tej Narayan Singh, Village- Kriparamdih, P.S.- Sikandra, District- Jamui. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Jay Ram Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. SMT. RITA VERMA ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 323, 341, 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
Allegation against the petitioners is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7051 of 2018(2) dt.05-02-2018 2/2 allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. They are in-laws. They are separate in mess and property from the husband of the victim. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioners have relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, in connection with Jamui (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 82/2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T