Ajmudin @ Ajimuddin @ Md. Ajmuddin v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70323 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-303 Year-2024 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ajmudin @ Ajimuddin @ Md. Ajmuddin S/o Aainul Haque R/o VillageLahan Dhaka, Ward No. 20, P.S.- Dhaka, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Karandeep Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Rana Randhir Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-01-2026 1.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 329(3), 324(4), 326(g), 109, 132, 221, 121(1), 121(2) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. & Sections 3⁄4 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case but then the said case was also instituted with respect to the same offence for which the instant FIR has been instituted. It is next submitted that informant alleges that four labourers while opening the centering of the toilet in the newly constructed house of Mahabir died due to suffocation, on account of which their
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70323 of 2025(2) dt.09-01-2026 2/3 family members and villagers became enraged when the victims were brought to the hospital and blocked the traffic and protested along with the dead bodies and also attacked the doctors and vandalized the hospital and set the ambulance parked in the hospital on fire and even attacked the police force and the fire-brigade personnel who had reached the place of occurrence.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name transpired during the course of investigation. It is also submitted that since four persons died, as such villagers were angry and a protest was made but then in every protest some lumpen elements are present. It is further submitted that petitioner resides nearby to the place of occurrence as such out of inquisitiveness had come to the place of occurrence to witness the occurrence when he came to be implicated.
5.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70323 of 2025(2) dt.09-01-2026 3/3 event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No.303/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T