Sonu Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73291 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-402 Year-2022 Thana- DIGHWARA District- Saran ====================================================== SONU RAI S/O RAJESHWAR RAI VILLAGE- NAWAL TOLA, PS. DIGHWARA, DIST. SARAN AT CHAPRA ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Virendra Kuar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 05-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Dighwara P.S. Case No. 402 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Allegedly, petitioner is said to have given knife blow on the neck of the informant, but it hit on his lip causing injury.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and he has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is totally false and based on concocted facts. Both the parties are co-villagers and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73291 of 2023(3) dt.05-03-2024 2/2 there is previous enmity between them. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there is serious allegation against the petitioner to assault the informant with knife due to which he sustained grievous injury. Hence, petitioner does not deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of the injury of the informant i.e. grievous, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T