Sandeep Kumar @ Sandeep Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73888 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2024 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada ====================================================== Sandeep Kumar @ Sandeep Kumar Yadav Son of Kishun Yadav @ Kisun Prasad Yadav R/O Vill.- Ammatari, P.S.- Rajauli, Dist.- Nawada, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Krishna Pd. Singh, Sr. Adv.

Mr.Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Narendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-02-2025 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 184 of 2024 registered for the offence under Section 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and others are said to have killed the deceased.

4. It has been submitted by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner that from the materials available on record, it appears that the deceased was staying in her parental house and was working in Jeevika Group and the petitioner was staying at Kolkata. He further submits that the deceased has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73888 of 2024(3) dt.20-02-2025 2/2 committed suicide and the presence of the petitioner at the place of occurrence has not come in the materials available on record. The deceased was first taken to Primary Health Care Center and thereafter she was taken to a Hospital at Nawadah. There is no statement of the deceased that she has been tortured by the petitioner and her family members.

5. Learned counsel for the informant has opposed the application of the petitioner and has submitted that the deceased has been killed within two years of marriage and therefore the petitioner may not be granted anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this application is allowed.

7. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-1st, Nawadah/concerned Court below in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 184 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U