Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72101 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2023 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== Chandan Kumar Son Of Ranajit Singh Village Rasalpur Ps Hilsa, DistrictNalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Saket Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Nawada Cyber P.S. Case No. 22 of 2023 dated 02.07.2023, registered for the offence punishable u/s 379 & 420 of the I.P.C. and Sections 66, 66(B), 66(D) , pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada/Concerned Court.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is quite innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to previous grudge. The allegations levelled against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. Petitioner has clean antecedent as mentioned in paragraph 3 of the petition. During investigation the name of the petitioner has surfaced on confessional statement of Guddu Kumar

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72101 of 2023(2) dt.29-11-2023 2/2 (shopkeeper) who was running a mobile shop and he stated that petitioner along with other co-accused persons namely Sanni Kumar @ Amit Kumar & Gaurav Kumar use to purchase phone on loan by submitting fake and forge documents from his shop.

4. Per contra, learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that the allegations levelled against the petitioners is serious in nature, hence they do not deserve anticipatory bail.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of case, nature of the offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail of the petitioners is hereby rejected. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court below within six weeks from today and seek regular bail and the learned Court below would pass order in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order on the very date of surrender.

6.This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) annpurna/- U T