Rakib Alam @ Md.Rakib Alam @ Md. Rakib @ Md. Rizwan @ Atal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74756 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-149 Year-2024 Thana- KAKO District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Rakib Alam @ Md.Rakib Alam @ Md. Rakib @ Md. Rizwan @ Atal Son of Moin Mian @ Md. Moinuddin Resident of village - Sulemanpur, P.S.- Kako, District - Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arbind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 302, 307 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 04.06.2024 at about 5 PM, informant's husband was called by Md. Shahzad through his mobile to meet at Kazisarai and therefore, her husband went there and while he was talking with Md. Shahzad, co-accused Md. Armaan and this petitioner came there and inflicted knife blow to informant's husband and Md. Shahzad, as a result of which, informant's husband died during treatment in Sadar Hospital, Jehanabad and Md. Shahzad was referred to PMCH for better treatment.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74756 of 2025(2) dt.03-11-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is brother-in-law of the deceased and there was matrimonial dispute between sister of petitioner and the deceased and as such, petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that police, after investigation, submitted final form against petitioner and he was not sent up for trial, however, differing with the same, learned Magistrate took cognizance. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest/surrender before the Court concerned within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jehanabad in connection with Kako P.S. Case No. 149 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. / Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T