← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6342/2018bail granted

Kali Prasad @ Sagar Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2018-03-29Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6342 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-225 Year-2017 Thana- NASRIGANJ District- Rohtas ======================================================

1. Kali Prasad @ Sagar Kumar,

2. Piyush Prasad @ Peish Kumar Both are sons of Ballu Prasad,

3. Shakti Kumar @ Shakti Prasad,

4. Bhola Prasad @ Bhola Sah, 3 and 4 are sons of Late Aasmani Prasad, All are resident of Village- Nasariganj, Ward No.- 8, P.S.- Nasriganj, District- Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

SMT. SHARDA KUMARI ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 69 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The names of the petitioners have transpired on the basis of disclosure made by the local Chowkidar. Except for

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6342 of 2018(4) dt.29-03-2018 2/2 this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioners in this case. It is alleged that 69 liters wine is recovered from the house of co-accused Ravi Kumar. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R./complaint case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum- Special Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Nasariganj P.S. Case No. 225/2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T