Chandra Shekhar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72075 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-270 Year-2025 Thana- BHAGWANPUR HAT District- Siwan ====================================================== Chandra Shekhar Sah S/o Late Banshi Sah Resident of Village - Koyrigawan, P.S. - Bhagwanpur Hat, District - Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bijay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-11-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State, Sri Chandra Bhushan Prasad. 2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on account of dispute relating to land, petitioner assaulted her by an iron rod causing fracture of her both hands and also assaulted her husband by an iron rod causing injury on head. 4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant along with his family members. It is next submitted that on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72075 of 2025(2) dt.11-11-2025 2/2 account of dispute relating to land, an altercation took place in which both sides assaulted each other and from the side of the petitioner, Bhagwanpur Hatt PS Case No. 269 of 2025 was instituted, as such the instant FIR is a counterblast. It is further submitted that from perusal of the order impugned, it would manifest that the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature, which amply demonstrates that petitioner never had any intention of committing a serious occurrence; and petitioner is not a criminal. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bhagwanpur Hatt P.S. Case No. 270 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T