Ghanshyam Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68643 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2008 Thana- FATUA District- Patna ====================================================== GHANSHYAM TIWARI Son of Ram Sewak Tiwari Resident of VillageNarma, P.S.- Fatuha, Dist- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rudra Deo For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-10-2019 Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 41 of 2008, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 120 (B), 34 the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. As per F.I.R the father of the informant was killed, two persons are said to have fired upon him. So far as petitioner is concerned it is stated that his instance father of the informant was killed.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that after investigation final form was submitted against the petitioner which was accepted also. However, Revision application filed by the informant and revision filed by the informant was allowed against which petitioner has also moved for quashing of the order passed in revision application which

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68643 of 2019(2) dt.25-10-2019 2/2 was dismissed as withdrawn.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the above submission, this application allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M, Patnacity, in connection with Fatuha P.S. P.S. Case No.-41 of 2008, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further condition is that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned with further condition that petitioner cooperate in the trial and appear as and when required. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) T.Kr./- U T