Krishna Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69789 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-196 Year-2019 Thana- DAUDPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Krishna Kumar Son of Rajendra Prasad Resident of Village - Kishanpura, P.S.- Basantpur, District - Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Madhu Mala Kumari, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-11-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent. It is next submitted that the instant FIR in which the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail arises out of a complaint case. It is further submitted that police after investigation submitted charge sheet under Sections 419, 420, 406 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is also submitted that petitioner, during the period of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69789 of 2025(2) dt.01-11-2025 2/3 investigation, was on police bond/bail. It is next submitted that petitioner never misused the privilege of police bail. It is further submitted that police in a mechanical manner submitted chargesheet.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that this Court in the case of Mahendra Prasad Singh Vs. State of Bihar reported in 2004 (3) PLJR 491, Sheochandra Singh Vs. State of Bihar reported in 2007 (4) BBCJ 66 and in Jagnarayan Yadav and others Vs. State of Bihar reported in 2010(2) PLJR 684 has very clearly laid the law that as to what steps have to be taken by the learned trial court with respect to an accused who is on police bail and after investigation charge sheet is submitted.

4. The learned APP for the State also is not in a position to oppose the submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to surrender before the learned trial court on or before 14.11.2025 and the learned trial court shall on the same day dispose of the application keeping in mind the law enunciated

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69789 of 2025(2) dt.01-11-2025 3/3 by this Court as recorded aforesaid.

6. The anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T