Bablu Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29272 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -320 Year- 2017 Thana -PURNEA SADAR District- PURNEA ====================================================== Bablu Kumar Yadav, S/o Nagendra Yadav @ Nagendra Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village- Milanpara, Khushkibagh P.S.- Khushkibagh, Distt.- Purnea.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Ansarul Haque ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 24-09-2018 It appears from the impugned order passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Purnea that the petitioner had failed to produce the permanent registration certificate of the vehicle before the learned Sessions Judge which was the reason for rejecting the application of the petitioner seeking release of the vehicle in question. It further appears that the investigation in the present case is complete as charge-sheet has already been submitted in the court below.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to submit adequate sureties to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea for purpose of release of the vehicle. He would also submit further undertaking as

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29272 of 2018 (2) dt.24-09-2018 may be required.

Learned counsel for the State is present.

In the given facts and circumstances, let the vehicle in question be released on the petitioner furnishing two sureties to the extent of the amount of the value of motorcycle in question as indicated in the insurance document to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea. The petitioner would further submit an undertaking that he will not deal with the vehicle in question in any manner whatsoever and shall produce the same as and when required by the court below. The vehicle shall be released after preparing a Panchnama of the vehicle in presence of the petitioner and petitioner shall give an undertaking that he will not question the Panchanama in course of evidence in the trial. This application stands disposed off accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Arvind/- U T