Balram Mahto @ Balam Mahto @ Balmiki Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75366 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2024 Thana- LACHHUAR District- Jamui ====================================================== Balram Mahto @ Balam Mahto @ Balmiki Mahto Son of Nakat Mahto @ Dhako Mahto Resident of Village - Hariharpur, P.S. - Lachuar, District - Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Jnan Chandra Bhardwaj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 28-04-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Lachhuar P.S. Case no.109 of 2024 registered under sections 307, 324, 324 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is that when the informant's brother went out to give milk on motorcycle, the petitioner along with others shot an arrow upon him which passed through his thigh and hit him in his stomach.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75366 of 2024(4) dt.28-04-2025 2/3 allegations made in the F.I.R is that an arrow was shot with an intention to kill him which entered the stomach of the victim through his thigh, however, the injury report annexed as Annexure-2 to the application issued by the Government Primary Health Center indicates that there is only one injury on the right thigh, which was simple in nature and hence, it does not corroborate allegations made by the informant. The injury report of the private hospital is also a part of the case diary which shows the said injury to be grievous in nature, however, it remains a fact that the injury is in the right thigh which is not on vital part of the body. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and undertakes to cooperate in the case/trial.
5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.
6. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Lachhuar P.S. Case no.109 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamui, subject to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75366 of 2024(4) dt.28-04-2025 3/3 condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023. (Soni Shrivastava, J) Harsh/- U T