Patna High CourtCWJC/5755/2017withdrawn

M/S. Singh Services v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-02-26Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5755 of 2017 =========================================================== M/s. Singh Services, through its proprietor, Sanjeev Kumar, S/o Sri Rajendra Singh, Resident of Village Kripaganj, P.O. Murgawan, P.S.- Ben, DistrictNalanda, PIN- 803114. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Executive Director, Bihar Health Society, Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Health Society, Sheikhpura, through its Secretary cum Civil Surgeon, Sheikhpura.

4. The Chairman cum District Magistrate, District Health Society, Sheikhpura, Bihar.

5. The Member Secretary cum Civil Surgeon, District Health Society, Shekhpura, Bihar.

6. M/S Radha Modern Mini Rice Mill, Radha Villa, Ward No.7, Bhabhua, District- Kaimur.

7. Aftab Infotect Pvt. Ltd, Vill+Post- Lakho, Ward No.4, Begusarari, DistrictBegusarai. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Samrendra For the Respondents : Mr. Kamlesh Kishore, AC to SC12 For Respondent No. 6 : Mr. Rajesh Kr. Mishra, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 26-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the respondent no. 6.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the entire tender process pursuant to the advertisement published in daily newspaper 'Prabhat Khabar' on 21.02.2017 issued by the District Health Society, Sheikhpura relating the work of hospital management in the district of Sheikhpura; and for connected reliefs.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that the writ

Patna High Court CWJC No.5755 of 2017 dt.26-02-2018 2/2 petition has become infructuous by efflux of time and seeks to withdraw the same.

4. Learned counsel for the State as well as learned counsel for the respondent no. 6 have no objection to this prayer.

5. In that view of the mater, the prayer in the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time and no positive relief can be granted at this belated stage.

6. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Chandran AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 27.02.2018 Transmission Date N.A.