← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16847/2017dismissed

Md. Jainuuddin Nadaf @ Md. Jainuuddin v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-18Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16847 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2017 Thana -CHHATAPUR District- SUPAUL ====================================================== Md. Jainuuddin Nadaf @ Md. Jainuuddin, S/o Late Bhudhan Nadaf, resident of Village & P.S.- Chatapur, District- Supaul. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vivek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Veena Rani Prasadd., APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Chatapur P.S. Case No. 22 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 295A, 298, 153A, 491 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per FIR there is involvement of the petitioner with respect to cut a cow at the house of co-accused Rasid and on such information a raid was conducted in the house of co-accused and a cow was found there and allegation is he cut the cow and tried to raise religious feeling of other community and there is allegation that petitioner was seen at the place of occurrence. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is nothing against the petitioner and he has been made

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16847 of 2017 (2) dt.18-04-2017 2/2 accused only on the basis of suspicion.

Heard learned APP also, who has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts stated above, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, rather petitioner should surrender and pray for regular bail, which shall be considered on its own merit also considering the fact other co-accused has been granted bail by the court below itself.

Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U