Ajay Mahto And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16950 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -99 Year- 2017 Thana -MADHEPURA District- MADHEPURA ======================================================

1. Ajay Mahto Son of Late Subhak Mahto @ Subhag Mahto

2. Bina Devi wife of Ajay Mahto Both residents of Village - Ratanura, Police Station - Madhepura (Ghailarh), District - Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 15-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Madhepura (Ghailarh) P.S. Case No. 99 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-304B, 201, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that husband of the deceased is in custody. The petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased.

From the written report itself, it appears that there is general allegation against the petitioners.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed it is ordered that the petitioners named above, in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16950 of 2017 (2) dt.15-05-2017 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Madhepura (Ghailarh) P.S. Case No. 99 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,

(2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T