Deenbandhu Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16012 of 2024 ====================================================== Deenbandhu Pandey Son of Late Vidya Pandey, resident of Town- Rataul, P.S. - Raxaul, Ward No. 18, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Chief Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Old Secretariat, Bihar at Patna.

2.

The Deputy Development Commissioner, East Champaran at Motihari. 3.

The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari. 4.

The District Rural Development Authority, East Champaran at Motihari. 5.

The Deputy Secretary, Panchayati Raj Vibhag, Bihar at Patna. 6.

The Sub -ordinate Officer (Anushravan Padadhikari) East Champaran, Motihari.

7.

The Joint Commissioner, State Sale Tax, Raxaul Anchal, Raxaul. 8.

The Commissioner, Muzaffarpur Division, Muzaffarpur. 9.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Sikarhna (Dhaka) East Champaran. 10.

That Block Development Officer, Ghorasahan, East Champaran. 11.

Ex- Mukhiya, Panchayat, Barwakala Sri Kush Kumar Barwakala Panchayat, Prakhand - Ghorasahan, East Champaran.

12.

Jayakanti Devi, W/o Ex. Mukhia, Barwakala Panchayat, Prakhand - Ghorasahan, East Champaran.

13.

Panchayat Sevak-Sri Vikram Rai, Panchayat - Barwakala, Prakhand - Ghorasahan, East Champaran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bishwajeet Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Gyan Prakash Jha, GA-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 23-10-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1(i). To issue an appropriate writ / writs order/orders, direction/directions in the nature of mandamus for punishing the Government officials as well as the private respondents for

Patna High Court CWJC No.16012 of 2024(2) dt.23-10-2024 2/2 engaging in embezzlement & misappropriation of the Government's fund to the tune of Rs. 5,69,38, 448=00 and conduct an enquiry through the competent authority."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U