Nanhak Prajapati @ Nanhaku Prajapati And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27684 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -204 Year- 2017 Thana -RAFIGANJ District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Nanhak Prajapati @ Nanhaku Prajapati @ Nanhaku Prajapati S/o Late Gopi Prajapati

2. Ramesh Prajapati @ Ramesh Prajapati S/o Nanhak Prakapati @ Nanhku Prajapati @ Nanhaku Prajapati

3. Mahesh Prajapati @ Mahesh Prajapati S/o Nanhak Prakapati @ Nanhku Prajapati @ Nanhaku Prajapati All R/o Village Jakhim, P.S. Rafiganj, District - Aurangabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-05-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Rafiganj P.S.Case No.204/17, registered for offences punishable under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.. Petitioners are father-in-law, Bhasur and Dewar and the case is of dowry death.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that they have nothing to do with the affairs of the deceased and moreover, no specific allegation has been attributed against them. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27684 of 2018 (2) dt.11-05-2018 2/2 circumstances, as stated above , let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Aurangabad in connection with Rafiganj P.S.Case no.204 of 2017 , subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make themselves available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bond. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T