Dhanu Kumar @ Dhnu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71730 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2025 Thana- CHAPRA TOWN District- Saran ====================================================== Dhanu Kumar @ Dhnu Kumar S/o Kanhaiya Mahto R/o Village- Paschimari, Rauja, P.S.- Town, Dist.- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-10-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant, Mr. Pratik.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 238 and 61(2) of the BNS, 2023.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant, at the outset, submits that it is a case of murder and petitioner is not named in the FIR, but during the course of investigation, his name transpired based on CDR investigation. It is also submitted that process under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. has been issued against the petitioner and in support of the same, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant produces the order passed by the learned District
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71730 of 2025(2) dt.15-10-2025 2/2 Court and a copy of the same has been shown to the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant, seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with liberty to the petitioner to surrender and seek regular bail.
5. Permission is accorded.
6. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
7. It is made clear that the learned District Court, while considering the regular bail application of the petitioner, shall not be prejudiced by the fact that petitioner before this Court withdrew his anticipatory bail application. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T