Arvind Pandey v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.678 of 2017 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 318 of 2017 =========================================================== Arvind Pandey, S/o Shri Shri Niwas Pandey R/o Village-Khirodharpur, P.O. Natwar, P.S. Bikramganj, Distt-Rohtas.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Land Reforms Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

3. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bikramganj, District Rohtas.

4. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Bikramganj, District -Rohtas.

5. The Circle Officer, Bikramganj, Distt-Rohtas.

6. The Panchayat Rojgar Sevak Officer, Bikramganj, District-Rohtas

7. The Panchayat Secretary, Panchayat Khirodharpur, Block-Bikramganj, DistrictRohtas.

8. Birendra Thakur, Son of Late Bhikhari Thakur, resident of Village-Khirodharpur, P.S. Bikramganj, District-Rohtas at Sasaram.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

For the Respondent/s :

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 07-07-2017 Delay of 15 days in filing of the appeal is condoned. I.A. No. 2771 of 2017 stands allowed and disposed of. The appellant was an intervenor in C.W.J.C. No. 318 of 2017 and holding that the intervenor is only a villager, a private person and an outsider, not aggrieved, who cannot be permitted to intervene, the learned Writ Court has dismissed the application for

Patna High Court LPA No.678 of 2017 dt.07-07-2017 2/2 intervention.

We see no error in the same warranting reconsideration. The Letters Patent Appeal stands dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) P.K.P.

AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 11.07.2017 Transmission Date