Seema Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.19018 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -19 Year- 2017 Thana -KARPI District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Seema Kumari, w/o Santosh Kumar, Resident of Narga, P.S. Karpi, District-Jehanabad .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rudal Singh, Advocate. Mr. Vinod Pandey, Advocate.
Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate.
For the State : Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 19-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Karpi P.S. Case No. 19 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 420, 419, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he was Mukhiya in Narga Gram Panchayat and he along with the Panchayat Secretary was member of the Selection Committee of the contract teacher of the aforesaid Gram Panchayat also. It has further been submitted that Panchayat Secretary namely, Indradeo Singh has already been granted anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.5.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. 15195 of 2017. The Selection Committee has verified the marks sheet of BETET supplied by the Bihar School Examination Board, Patna. The
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19018 of 2017 (2) dt.19-05-2017 2/2 petitioner has no concern with the Board Certificate of Madhuri Kumari.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Karpi P.S. Case No. 19 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T