Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20651/2018allowed

Ramraj Bind @ Ram Raj Bind v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-04-26Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20651 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -689 Year- 2014 Thana -ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Ramraj Bind @ Ram Raj Bind, son of Late Radha Bind, resident of VillageUlho, Police Station- Sheosagar, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Nathuni Bind, son of Late Wanshi Bind, resident of Village- Ulho, Police Station- Sheosagar, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 689 of 2014 lodged for the offences punishable under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation as per FIR is that some land of the petitioner was acquired in the Son Canal and for that compensation was given, but the informant claimed that he has also his share in that land and he has not been given compensation.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that earlier the complainant has made a complaint before the District Land Acquisition Officer but the same has been withdrawn later on as the land belonged to the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20651 of 2018 (2) dt.26-04-2018 2/2 Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Complaint Case No. 689 of 2014, subject to the conditions under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further condition that one of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of court concerned. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U