Imamuddin Ansari @ Imanuddin Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71130 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2025 Thana- PARSATHUA District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Imamuddin Ansari @ Imanuddin Ansari S/O Late Bismillah @ Bismilla R/O Village- Sobhipur, P.S.- Parsathua, District- Rohtas 2.

Rubi Khatoon @ Rubi Begam W/O Imamuddin Ansari @ Imanuddin Ansari R/O Village- Sobhipur, P.S.- Parsathua, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Parsathua P.S. Case No. 61 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 80(2), 103(1), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Prosecution story, in short, is that the petitioners along with other family members have killed the deceased for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner no.1 is the father-in-law and petitioner no.2 is the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71130 of 2025(2) dt.09-10-2025 2/2 mother-in-law of the deceased. There is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. Learned counsel further submitted that there is no specific allegation of demand of dowry from these petitioners. The husband of the deceased is already in custody. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioner no.1 is in custody since 03.07.2025 whereas petitioner no.2 is in custody since 28.06.2025 and have no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, there being no direct allegation against the petitioners as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Parsathua P.S. Case No. 61 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T