Patna High CourtCWJC/6722/2017disposed

Akhilesh Kumar Mishra And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-04-10Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6722 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Akhilesh Kumar Mishra Son of Shri Padma Nand Mishra, Resident of Ward No. 08, Ramnagar, Sohagmara, P.S.- Bardaha, District- Araria.

2. Chandrakant Kumar Nirala, Son of Shri Devnandan Prasad, Resident of Nagava Ka Tola Lalitpur, Village- Nagarnausa, P.S.- Nagarnausa, District- Nalanda.

3. Vijay Kumar, Son of Shri Ayodhya Garai, Resident of 43, VillageDekapura, P.S.- Rahui, District- Nalanda.

4. Nawnit Kumar, Son of Shri Nawal Prasad, Resident of Daraura, Ratanpura, Darwara, P.S.- Noorsarai, District- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Animal and Fisheries Resources Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. Director, Directorate of Animal Husbandry, Bihar, Patna.

3. Bihar Public Service Commission, Patna through its Secretary.

4. Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission, Patna.

5. Secretary, Bihar Public Service Commission, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhinav Srivastava For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Roy-Gp18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 10-04-2018 Heard.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied in case they are granted a liberty to file representation before the respondent no.2 and the respondent no.2 may be directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner within a specified time frame. Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioners shall file a consolidated representation before the respondent no.2 regarding their grievances raised in the writ petition within a

Patna High Court CWJC No.6722 of 2017 (2) dt.10-04-2018 2/2 period of two weeks from today and the respondent no.2 is directed to dispose of the same within a period of four weeks thereafter, considering the decision taken by the cabinet dated 4.3.1014 and 21.3.2016 contained in Annexures-3 and 4 to the writ petition, which shall be filed by the petitioners along with their respresentation.

The writ petition is disposed of on the aforesaid terms.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) BTiwary/- U