← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17865/2022disposed

Deepmala Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-23Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17865 of 2022 ====================================================== Deepmala Kumari Wife of Sri Dinesh Kumar Mahto, resident of MohallaKathalwari, Post Office- Lalbagh, Police Station- Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Darbhanga, District- Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, SC/ST Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, SC/ST Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, SC/ST Prak- Examination Training Center, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Darbhanga.

4.

The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.

5.

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Darbhanga. 6.

The Deputy Director, Welfare Department, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga. 7.

The District Welfare Officer, Darbhanga.

8.

Deepak Kumar Jha Son of Sri Lakshaman Jha Resident of village- Thalwara, Post Office- Thalwara, Police Station- Hayaghat, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the State :

Mr.S.K. Mandal (Sc3) For the LNMU University:

Mr. Iqbal Asif Niazi, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 23-04-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1.(A) A Certiorary for setting-aside the Order / Letter dated 02.09.2022 (Annexure14) passed by the District Welfare Officer, Darbhanga (Respondent No. 7) whereby the petitioner has been removed from the service (B) A Mandamus commanding the Respondents to re-instate the petitioner in

Patna High Court CWJC No.17865 of 2022(2) dt.23-04-2024 2/2 service with all consequential benefit.

(C) A Mandamus commanding the Respondents to pay the arrears of salary from September 2021 to till date."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondent-authorities for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U