Umed Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.25397 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -30 Year- 2017 Thana -SHAKURABAD District- JEHANABAD ======================================================
1. Umed Yadav , son of Lal Laldeo Yadav,
2. Suresh Yadav, Son of Diplal Yadav, Both resident of Village Tula Bigha, P.S. Shakurabad Distt. Jehanabad.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Meena Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-07-2017 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State of Bihar.
This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Shakurabad Police Station Case No. 30 of 2017, disclosing offences under Sections 341/323/448/307/ 504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Referring to the First Information Report, learned Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that registration of the present First Information Report is a result of some dispute between the parties, civil in nature. According to him, even if the allegations are treated to be true, all the injuries have been found to be simple in
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25397 of 2017 (2) dt.07-07-2017 2/2 nature, except the fracture of the little finger bone. Considering the above submission, this application is allowed.
Let the petitioners, namely, Umed Yadav and Suresh Yadav, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate - cum- Sub Judge I, Jehanabad, in connection with Shakurabad Police Station Case No. 30 of 2017, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
This is subject to the condition that the petitioners shall present themselves before the police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on their part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √ T √