Islam Ansari @ Islam Miyan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73081 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-673 Year-2022 Thana- MUFFASIL District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.
ISLAM ANSARI @ ISLAM MIYAN Son of Late Firangi Miyan R/VMahanagani, P.S- Muffasil Bettiah, Dist- West Champaran 2.
Md. Kadeer Ansari Son of Islam Ansari @ Islam Miyan R/V- Mahanagani, P.S- Muffasil Bettiah, Dist- West Champaran 3.
Md. Umar Ansari @ Umar Ansari Son of Islam Ansari @ Islam Miyan R/VMahanagani, P.S- Muffasil Bettiah, Dist- West Champaran 4.
Md. Rustam Ansari @ Rustam Ansari Son of Islam Ansari @ Islam Miyan R/V- Mahanagani, P.S- Muffasil Bettiah, Dist- West Champaran 5.
Yasmeen Jahan Wife of Md. Umar Ansari @ Umar Ansari R/VMahanagani, P.S- Muffasil Bettiah, Dist- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 02-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 327, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code pending in the learned court below.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the informant has tried to give the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73081 of 2022(2) dt.02-02-2023 2/2 civil dispute to appeal color of criminal offence by mixing the allegation of threat etc. He submits that there is land dispute between the parties which is clear from the FIR itself. He further submits that petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.
Learned APP for the State opposes for prayer for bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the fact that there is civil dispute between the parties, let the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court below, where the case is pending/Successor court, in connection with Bettiah Mufassil P.S. Case No.673/2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T